Agreed about Boston. At the same time, Boston hasn't played any "heavy" teams in the playoffs.glen a richter wrote:The D will have to continue to be strong, and it would be nice to get Dunn back for the finals. Boston is basically San Jose with better goaltending, so I'd expect tighter games where the defense will make a lot of the difference.
Toronto - no real defense.
Columbus - has a defense, but lacks offensive depth. Tries to play heavy, but doesn't really have enough depth to play that way. Jarmo brought in more skill, which helped until they hit a team that truly plays heavy and had better goaltending.
Carolina - again, lacks offensive depth. Really young defense, which does have size and tries to play heavy. They just got out-heavied and out goaltended. More of the latter than the prior.
Even DeBoer said this - the two heaviest, hardest, most organized teams are meeting in the Stanley Cup Final.
Blues are the deepest team the Bruins have played and vice versa. As to heavy play, the Blues already got that from Winnipeg for series and San Jose for about 3 games.
My concerns facing the Bruins:
1) their big set breakout play is the kind which gives the Blues fits defensively. 4 guys to right of center working up ice together... 5th guy works up left wing alone ahead of them... Someone gets the puck to that lone guy and he winds up with a breakaway. Then flip the play to the other side of the ice depending whose on the ice. Why it's a problem for the Blues is they tend to lose the lone guy shooting up ice who isn't near the puck. Dallas was good at taking advantage of this, which is part of why it went 7 games. San Jose didn't try this hardly at all.
2) Tukka Rask is playing extremely well. We'll see what the Blues can do to him, as long as they keep playing the get the puck to the net with traffic game.
No matter what, a "former Blues player" wins the Cup, again, since Perron is both - former and current.