It didn't happen in Chicago. It happened in Buffalo.Kerfuffle wrote:That's not what happened. The version you told is the rumor version that has been spread and much like the telephone game it's taken on a new life as people have added to it over the years. On the Kings board they thought Kane had ruthlessly beat an old man - to the point of near death. On the Minnesota board one guy posted that the cab driver needed facial reconstructive surgery due to Kane's 'behavior'. Your version here is that he beat him up over 20 cents - which is the more popular version. None of these are based in fact. The true story is that yes Kane and his cousin acted improperly that night and yes alcohol was involved. An argument started cause the cabbie was ticked they gave him only $15 for a $14.80 cab fare. So the cabbie locked them in the back seat. If you're not familiar with Chicago cabs they remove the rear seat door latches to prevent people from jumping out without paying. So once you pay the driver unlocks the door and you get out. The Cabbie in this case left the doors locked and Kane and his cousin wanted to get out after paying. Apparently a punch was thrown at the driver and accounts differ on who threw it but both are guilty. It's a felony to assault a cab driver in Illinois for any reason. So yes Kane and his cousin were in the wrong cause you can't lay your hands on another -but these stories about the cab driver being 'beaten up' are wrong.cprice12 wrote:To me, Kane will always be the guy who beat up that Cab driver over pocket change.
And do you have a source for that version of the story?
The "version" I am aware of is what was reported by news organizations right after it happened...not some version I heard years later. I also just did a few different searches and didn't find your version of the incident...just a ton of articles and news reports which matched the version I am familiar with.
This seems similar to the vaccinations cause autism discussion. One study found a link (later discredited)...and 10,000 other studies find no link...yet you go with the one study that found a link.
[youtube][/youtube]
So if you have a credible link, please share.