Winchester to Ducks
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:06 pm
per hockeybuzz
Discuss the St. Louis Blues, the NHL, or whatever.
http://letsgoblues.com/phpBB/
It's a good deal. I just don't want the Pansy Blues. Winchester is a good teammate.cardsfan04 wrote:I like it.
I've always liked Winchester, but we really don't need him and Crombeen both. A 3rd round pick is much better than losing him as a FA.
I'd rather have Winchester then Crombeen, but I agree about getting something for him instead of letting him walk.cardsfan04 wrote:I like it.
I've always liked Winchester, but we really don't need him and Crombeen both. A 3rd round pick is much better than losing him as a FA.
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you.
That's what they said the plan was when Walt retired, that Brad would replace him on the PP.tjk002 wrote:. He couldve/shouldve been used on power plays more in front of the net.
DaDitka wrote:northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you.
Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you.
Who's they?DaDitka wrote:That's what they said the plan was when Walt retired, that Brad would replace him on the PP.tjk002 wrote:. He couldve/shouldve been used on power plays more in front of the net.
The problem is that when they gave Brad the opportunity, he imitated Walt from last year and played on the half boards instead of in front of the net.
northwest dave wrote:Who's they?DaDitka wrote:That's what they said the plan was when Walt retired, that Brad would replace him on the PP.tjk002 wrote:. He couldve/shouldve been used on power plays more in front of the net.
The problem is that when they gave Brad the opportunity, he imitated Walt from last year and played on the half boards instead of in front of the net.
I thought it was Backes that Andy Murray said emulated Tkachuk.
northwest dave wrote:DaDitka wrote:northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you.
Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman
Wondering if Vancouver has sights on Jax. However, Blues need something in return (not a draft), the defense is very thin already. Maybe there is a 3-way deal somehow.
Petro - Cola - Polak - Nitikin - Shatty - and then Strachan or Cole....Yikes.
But the Blues would need a dman coming back. Vancouver wouldn't do that.DaDitka wrote:northwest dave wrote:DaDitka wrote:northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you.
Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman
Wondering if Vancouver has sights on Jax. However, Blues need something in return (not a draft), the defense is very thin already. Maybe there is a 3-way deal somehow.
Petro - Cola - Polak - Nitikin - Shatty - and then Strachan or Cole....Yikes.
Vancouver would have to send someone back (or they would have to send someone down) because they are against the cap.
What difference does it make? It's not like Jackman is playing D either.northwest dave wrote:But the Blues would need a dman coming back. Vancouver wouldn't do that.DaDitka wrote:northwest dave wrote:DaDitka wrote:northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you.
Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman
Wondering if Vancouver has sights on Jax. However, Blues need something in return (not a draft), the defense is very thin already. Maybe there is a 3-way deal somehow.
Petro - Cola - Polak - Nitikin - Shatty - and then Strachan or Cole....Yikes.
Vancouver would have to send someone back (or they would have to send someone down) because they are against the cap.