Page 1 of 2

Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:06 pm
by 18tonytwist
per hockeybuzz

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:08 pm
by LazyPenguin
3rd round pick.

I'll take that.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:10 pm
by northwest dave
This will make the Ducks/Blues games interesting.

I was always a fan of Winchester. Big boy, fights...good 4th liner.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:17 pm
by cardsfan04
I like it.

I've always liked Winchester, but we really don't need him and Crombeen both. A 3rd round pick is much better than losing him as a FA.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:18 pm
by northwest dave
cardsfan04 wrote:I like it.

I've always liked Winchester, but we really don't need him and Crombeen both. A 3rd round pick is much better than losing him as a FA.
It's a good deal. I just don't want the Pansy Blues. Winchester is a good teammate.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:23 pm
by DaDitka
cardsfan04 wrote:I like it.

I've always liked Winchester, but we really don't need him and Crombeen both. A 3rd round pick is much better than losing him as a FA.
I'd rather have Winchester then Crombeen, but I agree about getting something for him instead of letting him walk.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:25 pm
by northwest dave
Reaves and Porter recalled.

Got to dress a full team I guess.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:36 pm
by stlmark
I like the deal!

I came around on Winchester this year, but I'm fine that he's gone.

Bye now!

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:37 pm
by northwest dave
If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you. :lol:

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:38 pm
by DaDitka
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you. :lol:

Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman :okman:

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:39 pm
by goon attack
Crombeen > Winchester

Winchester pissed me off this year. He showed very little leadership on the ice and generally tripped over his own feet every game. dude did not up his game at all, which means he is a damn loser and I'm glad the clown is gone.

He was basically utterly useless this year. :facepalm:

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:44 pm
by tjk002
Like all the other trades so far. Don't like this one. Winchester was a good teammate and he had what 9 goals with very limited ice time. He couldve/shouldve been used on power plays more in front of the net. He had ability. Maybe we pull a fast one (again) and sign him next year.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:47 pm
by DaDitka
tjk002 wrote:. He couldve/shouldve been used on power plays more in front of the net.
That's what they said the plan was when Walt retired, that Brad would replace him on the PP.

The problem is that when they gave Brad the opportunity, he imitated Walt from last year and played on the half boards instead of in front of the net.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:52 pm
by northwest dave
DaDitka wrote:
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you. :lol:

Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman :okman:

Wondering if Vancouver has sights on Jax. However, Blues need something in return (not a draft), the defense is very thin already. Maybe there is a 3-way deal somehow.

Petro - Cola - Polak - Nitikin - Shatty - and then Strachan or Cole....Yikes.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:53 pm
by The Bob Essensa Xperience
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you. :lol:
Image

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:53 pm
by northwest dave
DaDitka wrote:
tjk002 wrote:. He couldve/shouldve been used on power plays more in front of the net.
That's what they said the plan was when Walt retired, that Brad would replace him on the PP.

The problem is that when they gave Brad the opportunity, he imitated Walt from last year and played on the half boards instead of in front of the net.
Who's they?

I thought it was Backes that Andy Murray said emulated Tkachuk.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:55 pm
by DaDitka
northwest dave wrote:
DaDitka wrote:
tjk002 wrote:. He couldve/shouldve been used on power plays more in front of the net.
That's what they said the plan was when Walt retired, that Brad would replace him on the PP.

The problem is that when they gave Brad the opportunity, he imitated Walt from last year and played on the half boards instead of in front of the net.
Who's they?

I thought it was Backes that Andy Murray said emulated Tkachuk.

Armstrong is they.

IN an interview before the season he said that he envisioned Brad filling Walt's role infront of the net on the PP.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:57 pm
by DaDitka
northwest dave wrote:
DaDitka wrote:
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you. :lol:

Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman :okman:

Wondering if Vancouver has sights on Jax. However, Blues need something in return (not a draft), the defense is very thin already. Maybe there is a 3-way deal somehow.

Petro - Cola - Polak - Nitikin - Shatty - and then Strachan or Cole....Yikes.

Vancouver would have to send someone back (or they would have to send someone down) because they are against the cap.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:59 pm
by northwest dave
DaDitka wrote:
northwest dave wrote:
DaDitka wrote:
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you. :lol:

Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman :okman:

Wondering if Vancouver has sights on Jax. However, Blues need something in return (not a draft), the defense is very thin already. Maybe there is a 3-way deal somehow.

Petro - Cola - Polak - Nitikin - Shatty - and then Strachan or Cole....Yikes.

Vancouver would have to send someone back (or they would have to send someone down) because they are against the cap.
But the Blues would need a dman coming back. Vancouver wouldn't do that.

Re: Winchester to Ducks

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:02 pm
by DaDitka
northwest dave wrote:
DaDitka wrote:
northwest dave wrote:
DaDitka wrote:
northwest dave wrote:If your name is Brad or Eric...lookout, the Blues will trade you. :lol:

Quick, change his name to Brad-Eric Jackman :okman:

Wondering if Vancouver has sights on Jax. However, Blues need something in return (not a draft), the defense is very thin already. Maybe there is a 3-way deal somehow.

Petro - Cola - Polak - Nitikin - Shatty - and then Strachan or Cole....Yikes.

Vancouver would have to send someone back (or they would have to send someone down) because they are against the cap.
But the Blues would need a dman coming back. Vancouver wouldn't do that.
What difference does it make? It's not like Jackman is playing D either.